Legging Out: Is It Worth the Risk for Traders?
Legging Out: Is It Worth the Risk for Traders?
By:Kai Zeng
Legging out unnecessarily extends the holding period and doesn’t guarantee better daily returns
As the stock market becomes more volatile, some of our balanced investments might see their profits swinging wildly, making our returns unpredictable.
This situation often makes investors question whether they should sell one part of their balanced investment to secure gains and then focus on opportunities with the other side that isn’t performing well. This method is known as “legging out of a position.”
Doing so might:
- Enable investors to increase potential profits.
- Safeguard profits from the part of the investment that’s nearly worthless and no longer provides protection to the other side.
- Decrease the number of unprofitable trades that occur because of swings in stock prices.
However, we usually avoid "legging out" of standalone investments like strangles. Removing one side first leaves the remaining part open to unlimited risk, which can make returns even more volatile and decrease profitability.
But what about strategies with limited risk—like iron condors? These involve put and call spreads that independently limit risk, raising the question of whether it would be beneficial to exit one side first if it’s already showing a significant profit.
To explore this, we conducted two studies of 45-day SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) strangles, adjusting by $10 increments.
Study 1:
- Closing the position at 21 days to expiration (DTE) or after achieving a 50% profit.
- Removing individual spreads if they reach 90% of their maximum potential profit.
The results showed that legging out of Iron Condors didn't have the desired outcome. Average daily returns noticeably decreased, suggesting investments were held for longer when trying to leg out.
In fact, less than 2% of scenarios showed the 21DTE/50% profit approach losing out to the legging-out strategy.
Next, we sought to shorten holding times by targeting smaller gains to improve potential performance.
Study 2:
- Same as before for closing positions.
- Removing individual spreads if the long option on the opposing side is breached.
Even in this scenario, legging out failed to perform better than our tried-and-true management approach. In fact, it showed worse results.
Takeaways:
- While it can be enticing to leg out of risk-defined positions, managing the entire trade at once proved more profitable.
- Legging out unnecessarily extends the holding period and doesn’t guarantee better daily returns.
Kai Zeng, director of the research team and head of Chinese content at tastylive, has 20 years of experience in markets and derivatives trading. He cohosts several live shows, including From Theory to Practice and Building Blocks. @kai_zeng1
For live daily programming, market news and commentary, visit tastylive or the YouTube channels tastylive (for options traders), and tastyliveTrending for stocks, futures, forex & macro.
Trade with a better broker, open a tastytrade account today. tastylive, Inc. and tastytrade, Inc. are separate but affiliated companies.
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options before deciding to invest in options.
tastylive content is created, produced, and provided solely by tastylive, Inc. (“tastylive”) and is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation that any security, futures contract, digital asset, other product, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any person. Trading securities, futures products, and digital assets involve risk and may result in a loss greater than the original amount invested. tastylive, through its content, financial programming or otherwise, does not provide investment or financial advice or make investment recommendations. Investment information provided may not be appropriate for all investors and is provided without respect to individual investor financial sophistication, financial situation, investing time horizon or risk tolerance. tastylive is not in the business of transacting securities trades, nor does it direct client commodity accounts or give commodity trading advice tailored to any particular client’s situation or investment objectives. Supporting documentation for any claims (including claims made on behalf of options programs), comparisons, statistics, or other technical data, if applicable, will be supplied upon request. tastylive is not a licensed financial adviser, registered investment adviser, or a registered broker-dealer. Options, futures, and futures options are not suitable for all investors. Prior to trading securities, options, futures, or futures options, please read the applicable risk disclosures, including, but not limited to, the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options Disclosure and the Futures and Exchange-Traded Options Risk Disclosure found on tastytrade.com/disclosures.
tastytrade, Inc. ("tastytrade”) is a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA, NFA, and SIPC. tastytrade was previously known as tastyworks, Inc. (“tastyworks”). tastytrade offers self-directed brokerage accounts to its customers. tastytrade does not give financial or trading advice, nor does it make investment recommendations. You alone are responsible for making your investment and trading decisions and for evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of tastytrade’s systems, services or products. tastytrade is a wholly-owned subsidiary of tastylive, Inc.
tastytrade has entered into a Marketing Agreement with tastylive (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade. tastytrade and Marketing Agent are separate entities with their own products and services. tastylive is the parent company of tastytrade.
tastycrypto is provided solely by tasty Software Solutions, LLC. tasty Software Solutions, LLC is a separate but affiliate company of tastylive, Inc. Neither tastylive nor any of its affiliates are responsible for the products or services provided by tasty Software Solutions, LLC. Cryptocurrency trading is not suitable for all investors due to the number of risks involved. The value of any cryptocurrency, including digital assets pegged to fiat currency, commodities, or any other asset, may go to zero.
© copyright 2013 - 2024 tastylive, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Applicable portions of the Terms of Use on tastylive.com apply. Reproduction, adaptation, distribution, public display, exhibition for profit, or storage in any electronic storage media in whole or in part is prohibited under penalty of law, provided that you may download tastylive’s podcasts as necessary to view for personal use. tastylive was previously known as tastytrade, Inc. tastylive is a trademark/servicemark owned by tastylive, Inc.